On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:31 AM Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Mike and Scott on the point that it’s worth explicitly > allowing the result to be a “can’t do it” publication. Implicit “couldn’t > do it” is fine in most cases, but here we might say something like, “If the > working group decides that none of the proposed approaches will work > acceptably well and is unable to find an acceptable alternative, it may > instead publish a report describing the problem and summarizing the reasons > that proposed approaches are not acceptable.” Making that explicit will > avoid arguments about whether such a document is within the charter scope. > Done, and thanks for that text. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
