On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 4:14 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Done, and thanks for that text. > > One nit, Barry's text should be above the proposals not below. It makes it > look like those are the only proposals on the table which I'm nearly > certain is not your intent. > One other thing though, should there be some bounds on what appears to be > the possibility of writing a BCP like document? I mean, I can think of some > things that could help mitigate this but they are pretty wonky and > definitely untested. Do we actually have that operational experience to > recommend anything? > The charter as-is is now up for IESG Evaluation and one AD has already commented on it, so I'm going to hold any edits until after the next telechat (on January 5th) so as not to give them a moving target. After that I'll apply this and any other feedback. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
