On 12/31/2022 2:37 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I take as evidence of this the fact that the first incarnation of the DKIM working group knew itself well enough to completely avoid the topic of user interfaces, for example.
The initial effort to form a working group in the IETF was pretty casual and surfaced a lack of sufficient consensus among advocates. The IETF said go away until there's more agreement.
We went away for a year, during which we developed the original version of DKIM, which demonstrated the coherence.
The current effort has none of that existing critical mass of work and agreement. This makes the effort quite a lot riskier.
The fact that things are taking quite a few months doesn't help. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net mast:@[email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
