Largely to repeat what I said at the mic, yesterday: The switch from SSP to ASP was the simplest possible change that modified the semantics of the name to be tailored to the From field, as it needs to be.
That said, I think that Pete's desire for an even more precise name, which is thereby less subject to any misinterpretation, is worth considering. I'm not sure it's important to change the name further, but I think that considering his concern is worthwhile, if only to force us to make sure we have community agreement on the nature, scope, whatever of this work: I take Pete's concern as basically being that the published record is by the domain cited in the From field, rather than by the user (full email address.) He's right. So ADSP (Author Domain Signing Practices) would be semantically better. Since people are saying "ASP" as letters, rather than a pseudo-word, "ADSP" isn't worse in terms of aesthetics. And as I noted, if folk want the name to be pronounceable, From Domain Signing Practices (frodosip) might satisfy the requirement... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
