Thanks Dave, I'd meant to start a timer on this. Let's say folks have 1 week to suggest new names (without long essays please, Dave's mail is a good model). The issue here is solely the name.
After that we'll take a strawpoll as mentioned yesterday. That'll start on the 19th and run for two weeks, just to be sure to be sure. I think a strawpoll where you can +1 all the ones you like might work (if we've more than 2 or 3 options). Happy to get feedback on that. S. Dave Crocker wrote: > Largely to repeat what I said at the mic, yesterday: > > The switch from SSP to ASP was the simplest possible change that modified the > semantics of the name to be tailored to the From field, as it needs to be. > > That said, I think that Pete's desire for an even more precise name, which is > thereby less subject to any misinterpretation, is worth considering. I'm not > sure it's important to change the name further, but I think that considering > his > concern is worthwhile, if only to force us to make sure we have community > agreement on the nature, scope, whatever of this work: > > I take Pete's concern as basically being that the published record is by the > domain cited in the From field, rather than by the user (full email address.) > > He's right. So ADSP (Author Domain Signing Practices) would be semantically > better. Since people are saying "ASP" as letters, rather than a pseudo-word, > "ADSP" isn't worse in terms of aesthetics. > > And as I noted, if folk want the name to be pronounceable, From Domain > Signing > Practices (frodosip) might satisfy the requirement... > > d/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
