Dave Crocker wrote:
> small clarification that I tossed off in the meeting:
>
> I think it's tolerable to stay with ASP. However I think it would be better
> to
> have a name that is more careful, per the kind of potential confusion that
> Pete
> cited (and demonstrated?)
I'd be happy to change it back to ssp and ignore this churn altogether.
Remember: each name change == interoperability stopper. There's a lot
more here than just this draft's proper place in a taxonomy.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
