Michael Thomas wrote: > I'd be happy to change it back to ssp and ignore this churn altogether.
I wouldn't. More importantly, I believe the working group achieved consensus on the current name. > Remember: each name change == interoperability stopper. I'd be quite interested in seeing your logic-chain to justify that assertion, for names on a draft document. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
