>Simple answer: If the purpose of the original text was to point out to >users who the message is really from in cases of suspected forgery, and >through whatever means the receiving system has decided that the real >responsible identity is the UAID and not the SDID , it seems to me to >fit better with the original intention of showing the user who the >message is really 'from' to point out the UAID.
Except that the UAID might or might not be an e-mail address. The one on this messgage isn't. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
