On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Michael Adkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it make more sense to suggest that the mail system make the UAID > clear to the reader if its the identity whose reputation was used to > deliver the message, and make the SDID clear to the reader otherwise?
The RFC seems to steer clear from it beyond emphasizing the differences between sdid / uaid. Maybe just leave this for the use case document I suggested? If it is inappropriate for an RFC, it could be produced as a maawg document. --srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
