On 1/26/09 3:38 PM, Siegel, Ellen wrote: > > The new text does introduce new terminology, but I disagree that it is adding > new concepts.
> The issue that the new text is attempting to address is that the existing > language describing the concepts is confusing, and in some cases inconsistent > and/or absent, and will likely lead to interoperability issues if it has not > already. > Please say more because this is not at all clear to me. Why are more TLAs (or in this case FLAs) there? Also, you've defined another term: Identity Assessor. Why? Finally, I'll add one more comment, and then I'll withdraw. There are a lot of errata filed for 4741. This is a good indication that it's probably time for another version, and I would view this as good news because it demonstrates a lot of work has occurred. Congratulations to all! Whether that version is PS or draft is a debate unto itself, but not my debate ;-) Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
