On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Charles Lindsey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:46:25 -0000, Al Iverson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So the UAID is essentially a sender-created identifier used for >> whatever purpose a sender wishes. > > Not quite. I expect conventions to arise for its use in particular > situations. For example, it might become common (even mandatory) to use it
Let's put it this way - that'd be "a purpose the sender wishes" and not entirely inconsistent with what you say. But it's place wouldnt be in the RFC - it'd be in a use case document such as I suggested some few dozen emails back ... --srs _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
