Hi Doug, At 10:40 22-03-2009, Douglas Otis wrote: >DKIM replay abuse is beginning, where i= values, as defined in RFC >4871, offer a method to mitigate intra-domain sources. Most larger >domains exhibit a small percentage of abusive accounts. When i= value >control fails, d= values will likely be removed from unconditional >acceptance lists, since DKIM replay defeats typical account rate limits.
I prefer not to get into arguments about abuse at this stage. I'll also avoid comments about "i=" on this thread. As you agreed to my sentence, maybe you might agree with some parts of John Levine's message. If we could iron out points of agreement and disagreement, it might help in moving forward. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
