On 3/23/09 1:49 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > The reason that l= was a bad idea is that it changes the answer to the > question of whether a message is signed from "yes" to "sort of". The > less sort-of, the better.
I'm sorry- in the plethora of email that is this list, I missed your position on l=. I take it from your note that it should be required or not at all? Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
