On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > Steve Atkins wrote: >> It's the existence of it that's a bad idea. The sole redeeming >> feature >> is that it's optional, and so receivers can treat any signature >> with l= >> as invalid, with no risk of affecting mail sent by competent senders. > > Not according to the Crocker-Levine axis. All your decisions are > belong to them.
I don't get your point. Could you clarify? Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
