> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Thomas [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:19 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected]; John R. Levine; Daniel Black; ietf- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the > receiving side > > > They won't honour ADSP "dkim=discardable" records posted by others. > > So is it that they won't honor it as the sole criteria, or that they > won't pay any attention to it at all? I can understand the former, > but the later would be pretty weird since it's a pretty large hint > that something's really wrong.
I really don't want to be seen as speaking for Google based on two or three sentences I exchanged with someone that works there. So let me answer this way: My own inference from the conversation is that they wouldn't discard/reject mail based on ADSP without a legal agreement to do so, but it might be used as a hint to move such mail into a spam folder. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
