Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:30:58 -0700

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:53 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; John R. Levine; Daniel Black
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the
receiving side

    
Another data point: Google Mail won't use ADSP because they will not
discard someone's mail outright without a written agreement from the
sending domain agreeing to same, absolving them of responsibility for
mail that never arrives.
      
You mean that they won't publish ADSP records? Or that they won't
respect
any ADSP records? Or that they won't discard "discardable" messages?
    

They won't honour ADSP "dkim=discardable" records posted by others.

I recall also having heard that they would like to get feedback on what (and how much) is being discarded.  Something along the lines of draft-shafranovich-feedback-report most likely, although someone would need to confirm that's sufficient.  I'm not sure this WG is the place to take that on as a work item, but if not here, where?

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to