Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dkim-reporting
>> I'd be fine with doing that through this WG, although we have chosen >> on several occasions not to take up that draft as a WG item. >> Instead, it's now in the proposed charter for the ARF WG. > > It's a DKIM thing. If it's going to be done, this group is the group > to do it. > > Backdooring it through another group is, at best, not going to be as > effective I don't think. It's not a question of a "back door". This WG decided some time ago that it was a good idea, but out of scope. As far as I can tell, that hasn't changed, so it's still out of scope. In any case, once it's a Proposed Standard, no one will care what working group sent it through. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
