> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 10:42 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal > > > I'd be fine with doing that through this WG, although we have chosen > > on several occasions not to take up that draft as a WG item. > > Instead, it's now in the proposed charter for the ARF WG. > > It's a DKIM thing. If it's going to be done, this group is the group > to do it. > > Backdooring it through another group is, at best, not going to be as > effective I don't think.
I think it has non-trivial relevance to both groups, and I don't consider doing it through ARF a sneaky move of any sort. Since the WG has turned it down a few times now, are you suggesting it should be an individual submission? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
