On 24/10/2009, at 15:13, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
My opinion is that N1 is arguable, but that N2 and N3 are not the case, and that we shouldn't resist advancing DKIM base to DS for reasons N2 and N3. My opinion is also that, while N1 might be true, the fact the IETF considers it worthwhile overrides that. And note that I'm only advocating advancement for DKIM base at this point; I think we DO need more experience with ADSP before we have any clue whether it's stable (or useful).
+1
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
