On 10/23/2009 05:08 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > Jim Fenton wrote: >> Good question. I wasn't proposing that we judge usefulness at all; I >> was responding to suggestions from others that measuring usefulness be >> included in the charter. > > > Well, I can certainly understand producing documents that discuss efficacy > (and > maybe even how to achieve it) but I don't understand refraining from moving > specs to Draft.
First, do no harm. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
