Jim Fenton wrote: > It's fairly easy to demonstrate interoperability of protocols, but > usefulness is much more difficult. DKIM is an infrastructure protocol, > designed to provide a basis for other mechanisms, such as domain-based > reputation, to operate. Those other mechanisms are as yet nascent; how > does one judge usefulness at this point?
Jim, This appears to be imposing criteria that go considerably beyond the IETF's requirements for Draft. From the standpoing of IESG process, how is this legitimate? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
