On 3/2/2010 12:42 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> You only need to remove A-Rs that claim to be from you. >> >> That's a claim worth challenging. > > Well, that's what section 5 of RFC 5451 says. If you think it's > wrong, why didn't you say so back when there was time to change it?
You might consider re-reading the second paragraph of that section. The question I am raising distinguishes between the mathematical purity of the MUST requirement, versus the pragmatic benefit of the MAY. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
