> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:28 AM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft > > > > "Roland Turner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 26/05/2010 22:48, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > >> However, domain B is not an innocent bystander, as they intentionally > >> configured their mail system to reject mail it shouldn't, and the > >> recipients at domain B support that decision, on some level. > > > >Domains don't subscribe to mailing lists, individual recipients do. The > >recipients in a domain may oppose the domain[-administrator]'s decision, > >but often lack the power to have it changed. "Failure to quit your job" > >cannot reasonably be construed as consent/support in this context. > > This just brings us back to the "Do domain owners have a right to control > how their domains get used in email" question. > > If they do, the point is irrelevant. > > If they don't, email authentication policy is wrong and we should just > stop. > > Scott K >
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
