> Is anybody going to be really upset if I go that route and then work toward a > WGLC later this year?
Nope, so long as it describes actual practice, as a BCP is supposed to do. It doesn't have to be universal practice, but it really should be something that someone, somewhere does, so we can at least have an existence proof that it doesn't immediately cause massive failures. Here's some actual practice I have observed in the wild: - sign list mail with a list signature (Yahoo Groups, Google Groups, this list, my lists) - add and sign an A-R header describing signatures on inbound mail (this list, Googlegroups using an X- header) - remove signatures from incoming mail (Googlegroups, Yahoo Groups, this list) - keep signatures from incoming mail even if they're broken (my lists) Anything else? Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor Please consider the environment before sending e-mail. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
