At this point, I personally see little value in "moving forward" with the MLM draft until the ADSP issues and 3rd party signer consideration are resolved. I think once we resolve the POLICY issue as it relates to list servers or any allowed 3rd party signer and consensus can be reached, then I believe the MLM guidelines can be better specified. I hope documents authors can step up and help resolve this long time known issue once and for all.
I personally do not believe it is a major issue and can be resolved simply by codifying the documents by relaxing the 5322.From bind and allowed for 3rd party signature policy declarations. (Note, just in case, I am not referring to the problematic authorized signers considerations.) -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > There was very little response to my last straw poll about where we go with > the MLM draft next. It certainly wasn't enough to be able to claim "rough > consensus" from a group this size. > > I have some feedback on the actual text from Jeff, Daniel and Dave to > incorporate, and I haven't forgotten that. But there remains the issue of > whether or not to split it into two or three documents covering specific > topics (a non-DKIM MLM BCP, a DKIM-specific MLM BCP, and a DKIM value-add for > MLMs informational), and whether or not to just drop the whole affair because > there's not enough we can really say anyway. > > Given my druthers I'd like to proceed with it the way it is since absent > rough consensus to change course, the right thing to do seems to be to press > on. (After thinking about that a bit, I have to admit that it's also the > most attractive to me since it's the least amount of work...) > > Is anybody going to be really upset if I go that route and then work toward a > WGLC later this year? > > -MSK > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
