> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 9:23 AM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] In the spirit of moving forward... > > On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:16 AM, McDowell, Brett wrote: > > > It was my understanding that the MLM BCP was intended to inform MLM > operators of what they should do with DKIM-signed mail. > > More of what they COULD do than what they SHOULD do, IIRC. > > And, that may provide a path to compromise: keep everything as less- > than-SHOULD (but still limited to very minimal changes required to > MLMs), publish as Experimental, and wait for the Best Current Practices > to emerge.
The current draft deliberately avoided using any normative language at all, and has Informational status only. Hopefully that satisfies those concerns. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
