On Monday, November 22, 2010 01:37:13 pm Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 11/21/2010 6:43 PM, Tsuneki Ohnishi wrote: > > But there is a small problem. It is rather polical. > > We have a telecommunication law that allows ISPs to discard > > forged email, but our Ministry so far does not acknowledge > > that failure of DKIM verification immediately equals to > > forgery, because there could be other reasons to fail. > > There are technical and operational reasons that can cause legitimate mail > that was originally signed with a legitimate DKIM signature, to fail to > verify. > > The fact that a signer signs all their mail does not mean that all their > mail will arrive with a valid signature. > > Simply publishing an ADSP record does not change this fact. ADSP can > perhaps be used productively for specific signers and verifiers, but it > does not work for all legitimate scenarios. > What does work for all legitimate scenarios?
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
