On 11/24/10 10:44 PM, Douglas Otis wrote: > On 11/24/10 11:38 AM, Mark Delany wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: >>> On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: >>>>> Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails >>>>> (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places >>>>> where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. >>>> This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect. >>>> >>>> Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these >>>> assertions are correct. >>> +1 >> -10 Please don't. It's out of scope for this group. > +100 (see your magnitude and raise you one) :^) > > Perhaps the best place to continue the discussion is on the asrg list. > It would be nice if there were a 5321-ietf mailing list.
There is one: [email protected] Or are you looking for a 5321-specific list? /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
