On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails > > (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places > > where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. > > This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect. > > Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these > assertions are correct.
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
