On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: > On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > > On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > > Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails > > > (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places > > > where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. > > > > This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect. > > > > Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these > > assertions are correct. > > +1
-10 Please don't. It's out of scope for this group. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
