On 24/11/10 16:02, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > +1. For different reasons, both ADSP and SPF seem to need a revision. > Is there an opportunity to be taken here?
Not in this WG with this charter. Let's get done with out work items. S. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
