On 5/11/2011 8:22 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> 3. As negotiating model's go, it is counter-productive to open with a >> fall-back offer.
Offering to participate in an unformulated experiment that has no schedule is a fallback, yes. > There is no sense in which this is a "fall-back". I see it as a > *better* mechanism for this document than BCP, if the IESG decides > that it agrees. The "experiment" is seeing if the IESG agrees, and > the fall-back is BCP. Perhaps I missed the working group discussion that agreed to this approach? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
