On 5/11/11 1:32 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > On 5/11/2011 10:17 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS. >> >> Probably not if it's made into an Applicability Statement: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-3.2 > > > That's simultaneously a reasonable and a terrible idea. > > The construct is currently unused and is also currently under discussion. > > IMO, we should stay away from nascent experiments about fuzzy topics with a > poor > track-record.
I'm going to pass on the experiment. I want to see if the guinea pig survives first. spt _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
