On 5/11/2011 10:17 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS. > > Probably not if it's made into an Applicability Statement: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-3.2
That's simultaneously a reasonable and a terrible idea. The construct is currently unused and is also currently under discussion. IMO, we should stay away from nascent experiments about fuzzy topics with a poor track-record. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
