Another non-onerous encryption approach I'm finding quite compelling: tcpcrypt (tcpcrypt.org).
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there are in fact ways to have encryption that are not onerous to > users. Secure HTTP encrypts, although having a standard certificate given > everybody is not the most "private" way to do things. Diffie-Helman > encrypts without user involvement. If we put our thinking caps on, I > suspect we could find a way to encrypt that isn't onerous.
_______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
