ietf-smtp  

Messages by Date

• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Tony Hansen
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification John C Klensin
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/29 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/28 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/28 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification SM
• 2007/11/28 Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification John C Klensin
• 2007/11/28 New Issue: NOOP clarification Hector Santos
• 2007/11/27 RE: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please Tony Finch
• 2007/11/27 Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/26 Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please Frank Ellermann
• 2007/11/26 Re: FWD: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard Tony Hansen
• 2007/11/26 Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/26 FWD: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard John C Klensin
• 2007/11/26 RE: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please John C Klensin
• 2007/11/25 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/11/25 Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please John C Klensin
• 2007/11/22 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Hector Santos
• 2007/11/22 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Hector Santos
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Frank Ellermann
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) Tony Finch
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) Tony Finch
• 2007/11/21 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/20 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Hector Santos
• 2007/11/20 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/20 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Hector Santos
• 2007/11/20 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/19 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/19 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/19 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? John C Klensin
• 2007/11/19 SRS and TBR (was: Fixing graylisting) Frank Ellermann
• 2007/11/18 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? Pete Resnick
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) John C Klensin
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation John C Klensin
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting Hector Santos
• 2007/11/18 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/11/18 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? John C Klensin
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation John C Klensin
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples Hector Santos
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2007/11/18 Re: Fixing Greylist - Its usage of 451 vs 450 SM
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/18 Re: Greylisting pitfalls Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/18 Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/18 2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples Hector Santos
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/18 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Alexey Melnikov
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) SM
• 2007/11/18 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation John C Klensin
• 2007/11/17 Fixing Greylist - Its usage of 451 vs 450 Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) SM
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/17 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/17 Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation) Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Peter J. Holzer
• 2007/11/17 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) John C Klensin
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/17 Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation) Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/17 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/17 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/16 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] SM
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation John C Klensin
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/16 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/16 Nature of spammers (was Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference)) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/16 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) John C Klensin
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/16 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Hector Santos
• 2007/11/16 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/16 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference // Alternative to Temp Error resource protection Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/16 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/16 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John C Klensin
• 2007/11/16 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/16 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/16 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/16 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John C Klensin
• 2007/11/16 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/16 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation SM
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/15 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) John C Klensin
• 2007/11/15 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation John C Klensin
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] SM
• 2007/11/15 Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Glenn Anderson
• 2007/11/15 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, changed delivery requirement Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Hector Santos
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John C Klensin
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] SM
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/15 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/15 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Hector Santos
• 2007/11/14 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/14 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Hector Santos
• 2007/11/14 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/14 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John C Klensin
• 2007/11/14 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] SM
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting Russ Allbery
• 2007/11/13 TBR again (was Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Tony Finch
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR] Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/13 Fixing graylisting [was TBR] John Leslie
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2007/11/13 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Tony Finch
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Frank Ellermann
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference SM
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/12 Re: response to David? David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/12 Greylisting usefulness (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference) David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Douglas Otis
• 2007/11/12 response to David? John Leslie
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Tony Finch
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference David F. Skoll
• 2007/11/12 Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference Dave Crocker
• 2007/11/12 SMTP Transferred-By-Reference John Leslie
• 2007/11/01 Re: Mailing List Last Call now open for draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-05.txt Tony Hansen
• 2007/10/18 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? SM
• 2007/10/18 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? George Schlossnagle
• 2007/10/18 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? Dave Crocker
• 2007/10/18 John Klensin incommunicado until next week Tony Hansen
• 2007/10/18 ISSUE: terminology (was: Mailing List Last Call now open for draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-05.txt) Frank Ellermann
• 2007/10/18 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? Frank Ellermann
• 2007/10/17 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? SM
• 2007/10/17 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? Dave Crocker
• 2007/10/17 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? Tony Finch
• 2007/10/17 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/10/17 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/10/17 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? Pete Resnick
• 2007/10/17 Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2007/10/17 Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return? Tony Finch

• Earlier messages
• Later messages