On 4/9/00 at 8:21 PM +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: >For those who believe this, please check out the technical merit of >draft-terrell-logic-analy-bin-ip-spec-ipv7-ipv8-05.txt, and ask >yourselves if this should be published as an RFC. It should not. See my message to Vernon. But it's not because it lacks technical merit that it shouldn't be published. >After that little exercise, you will appreciate that technical merit >*is* a factor in deciding publication of an Experimental or >Informational document. Not if RFC 2026 is respected. I see nothing in 2026 allowing for this possibility. pr -- Pete Resnick <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eudora Engineering - QUALCOMM Incorporated Ph: (217)337-6377 or (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
- Re: recommendation against publication of d... Dave Crocker
- Re: recommendation against publication... Keith Moore
- prohibiting RFC publication Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publicatio... Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Peter Deutsch
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Martin J.G. Williams
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Fred Baker
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... ned . freed
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... ned . freed
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publicatio... Karl Auerbach
- Re: prohibiting RFC public... Fred Baker
