I'd like note my agreement with to the comments made by Dave Crocker. And I would like to suggest that there is perhaps yet another aspect of this debate: The IETF recently made a strong moral statement against CALEA. That statement carried weight; it was noticed; it had impact. And that statement carried weight precisely because it was unique - it was a statement of morality that carried weight because such statements are reserved for the worst of the worst. If the IETF engages in routine non-acceptance of "informational" documents on the basis of non-technical concerns the IETF will, I believe, lose its clear and loud voice when that voice is most needed to be heard. --karl--
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication ned . freed
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication ned . freed
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Karl Auerbach
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Fred Baker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Tripp Lilley
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication RJ Atkinson
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication John Stracke
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication John Martin
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore