On 2011-06-09 04:17, james woodyatt wrote: > On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: >> From: Martin Rex <m...@sap.com> >>> Classification of 6to4 as historic is [in]appropriate use of the IETF >>> process, because it would be a political .. statement. >> Well, we've never done _that_ before, have we? Wouldn't want to set an >> unfortunate precedent. > > I see no reason for IETF to avoid setting standards for layer-9 protocols.
In any case, I don't see the politics, unless (for example) declaring RFC 1267 Historic was politics too. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
