On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:20 , Keith Moore wrote: > > Declaring 6to4 Historic certainly won't prevent people from implementing it. > But the proposed action is clearly intended to discourage implementation of > 6to4. It says so explicitly. Of course some vendors will ignore it, but > some vendors will probably not ignore it.
I would absolutely agree that the document would be improved if this pointless recommendation were removed. I expect some perfectly reasonable people will still oppose it with understandable concerns. Nevertheless, I do think this particular recommendation is inconsistent with the consensus in IETF that a phase-out plan for 6to4 is unwarranted. -- james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> member of technical staff, core os networking _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
