I checked IP: 12.22.58.30 using the dnsstuff site which I subscribe to and
find:
SORBS DNSBL 127.0.0.2
"Aggregate zone See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?12.22.58.30";
http://www.de.sorbs.net/overview.shtml
SORBS-SPAM 127.0.0.6
"Spam Received See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?12.22.58.30";
http://www.au.sorbs.net/overview.shtml
So the answer is we are on the SORBS list(s) ...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> >>
> >>> the ietf has some of the more heavily and consistently moderated mailing
> >>> lists on the planet.
> >>
> >> but how well does the IETF do in not producing email in response to SPAM?
> >> Seems the IETF generates a lot of backscatter, and aside from scattering
> >> this to individual boxes all over the Internet, it's going to scatter into
> >> various spam traps… and that's likely to cause a listing in any services
> >> that use spam traps. Those who implement spam traps do put filters on
> >> them, so that commonly produced bounces don't cause listing, but it's had
> >> to deal with the many custom bounce messages (especially ones which don't
> >> use standard headers to indicate they are auto-generated).
> >>
> >> Has anyone examined all the various sorts of auto-generated messages the
> >> IETF produces to make sure they are reasonably detected as auto-generated
> >> messages?
> >>
> >> That should be part of us doing our part to help deal with SPAM.
> >
> > I watch all the bounces for about half a dozen of the high traffic lists.
> >
>
> Can you (or anyone else) confirm the IETF status ? DId we get off of
> the blacklist?
>
> Regards
> Marshall
>
> > One of the more annoying things I see is bounces from subscribed members
> > due to the sender being listed somewhere. when this happens with frequency
> > those particapants that bounce messages to mailman get ejects from the
> > list... We don't have the luxury of just ejecting someone from list because
> > the source ip they are using today is listed in spamhaus but if you recject
> > enough mail from us you're going to fall off.
> >
> > Honestly I think the backscatter is frankly rather low as a purportion of
> > net volume but the volume is large.
> >
> > A busy day on the ietf discuss list bursts out to a few hundred thousand
> > messages however, for a single list.
> >
> >> -- Kurt
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
