On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:25:14AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Also keep in mind that raid 5 means less usable place for data (that can
> be fetched from elsewhere, in such an event). Is it worth the price?
Don't we have a filesystem for Linux nowadays which could handle such
things (one disk suddenly going away) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/