From: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:08:06PM +0300, Chen Shapira wrote: > > > > > In any case, my suggestion for now is to disable it, so > > > people won't be > > > mislead by it. We can replace it with a link to our archive, > > > but without > > > specifying the version number. (unless we want to use > > > JavaScript which I > > > don't recommend to.) > > > > Can you explain what javascript solution you have in mind, and why is it not > > recommended? > > > > I don't see such solution, but if you have one, perhaps we'll manage to make > > it workable... > > Fichs. Why do it on the client side, when it can be done on the server > side? All it requires a one line cgi script to finger kernel.org and > output the result. THe reason I did not implement it yet is that doing > it within zope is not trivial, and I did not have the time to delve > into it.
Not trivial? how hard including file from zope is? You don't need to do the actual downloading/parsing within zope, you can just setup a cron job that'll write the html to a sperate file every once in a while... Sagi ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
