Hi, On 8/24/05, J.Bakshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 03:34:08 -0700 (PDT) > Subhobroto Sinha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- "J.Bakshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > definitely all newer AMD supporting MB supports > > > UDMA, hence I also have UDMA supports in my mobo. > > > > Right on.. > > > my compiled kernel 2.6.10 doesn't support UDMA,( > > > > Ah! So that was the problem. > > > > > ... today I have > > > installed 2.6.8-K7 kernel-image from sarge and bingo > > > ! now I have UDMA too -;) > > > > It would have been better if you compiled the kernel > > on your machine, believe me - it's a great experience > > ;) > > I have started compiling kernels from 2.2.x . I use 2.6.10 *compiled* > kernels. That's great. So, what kind of IO and cpu schedulers do you use generally. I see from your couple of posts that you do run some low end boxes. Have you got any interesting results by varying those schedulers. Or any other aggressive patchsets like mm. And do you like the 2.6 based udev system over devfs in 2.4.
-siddhartha -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
