On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 16:29, Jasmeet S. Virdi wrote: > Some more doubts :) > $ You are only obliged to reveal the source to > $ the people you give the binaries of your program to -- not > $ the original author, not any `community'. However, you have > $ to distribute the source under the GPL itself, so the > $ recipients are free to disseminate your source more widely if > $ they choose. > > 1. Does it talk anywhere about making the binaries/source code available > for FREE ? Can I sell the rework ? (assuming I used GPL'ed code).
OK I am doing a intrepretation. So take my words with pinch of salt. 1) Any work derived from GPL source has to be GPLed unless its for private purpose. 2) LICENSE and money are not related. You sell GPLed product for money or any other thing that suits you. > > 2. Redhat says "IP Load Balancing (Piranha) is based on Open Source > Linux Virtual Server (LVS) technology, with significant Red Hat > enhancements". Since LVS is open source and licenced under GPL, does it > mean that I can ask Redhat for the source code of piranha if I buy > redhat AS edition and then make it available for free ?? > I dunno the details > $ Re point 3, I doubt if anyone would sue you for > $ `look-and-feel' if you made, e.g., a clone of Konqueror :) > I think look-and-feel suits is in fashion among apple freaks. > -js > > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > _______________________________________________ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
