On 16/06/07, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 16-Jun-07, at 2:50 AM, vivek khurana wrote: > > >> before you start insulting lawyers recall that the > >> source for the > >> practice of the legal profession has been free for > >> centuries now. No > >> lawyer patents his innovative arguments. > > > > I dont think arguments are patentable entities, are > > they ? > > and the difference between algorithms and arguments is?
VK's point being that just as algorithms came in to preview so would arguments. Extending the reach of patents to software is a debate that still is not dead in Europe. Any ways interesting point even though not really valid in law ...yet! -- Regards, Sudev Barar _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
