Quoting Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 16/06/07, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 16-Jun-07, at 2:50 AM, vivek khurana wrote: > > > > >> before you start insulting lawyers recall that the > > >> source for the > > >> practice of the legal profession has been free for > > >> centuries now. No > > >> lawyer patents his innovative arguments. > > > > > > I dont think arguments are patentable entities, are > > > they ? > > > > and the difference between algorithms and arguments is? > > VK's point being that just as algorithms came in to preview so would > arguments. Extending the reach of patents to software is a debate that > still is not dead in Europe. Any ways interesting point even though > not really valid in law ...yet!
wonder what will happen when some american patents the googly _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
