On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Gaurav Mishra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As Manoj has pointed out, there is probably a problem right now, and he
>> might be right about it. My take is that it is not always an
>> intentional thing but more of a case of a problem in managing the a
>> project of the scale of Ubuntu.
>>
>
> Fully agreed , This is a very logical and practical reasoning. However
> blaming Ubuntu is crazy
So, a project that handles only a fraction of the packages
Debian does (only a couple thousand in the main repo, iirc), 95% of
which it pulls through unchanged from Debian (there does no work on
them), which handles one tenth of the architectures Debian supports,
with corporate backing from a billionaire (which Debian does not have),
they do less well of a job than unpaid Debian volunteers can, and for
that stellar performance, they are suppoosed to be criticism free?
Jesus.
manoj
--
Forty two.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
