On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 03:43  PM, Steve Holroyd wrote:

> It is important to appreciate that, while the issue of profit might 
> have an
> overall effect on the seriousness with which a breach might be viewed, 
> it
> does not necessarily stop an action being viewed as a breach of 
> copyright
> law. After all, if memory serves, Napster was non-profit making 
> originally
> when it was taken to court and convicted.

Napster is/was a for-profit corporation. They just weren't actually 
TURNING a profit. ;D


-- 
The iMac List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 - Epson Stylus Color 580 Printers - new at $69    |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

iMac List info:         <http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/imac-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------
>The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com
---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to