> > - Open Private List - open for all to subscribe, but only those with the
> > password can post?  I think that sort of flexibility would be useful for
> > virtual board meetings conducted through email.  Members of an
> association
> > could subscribe, and listen in on the conversation, but not post on the
> > list.
>
> THAT concept would very useful - I'll help you beg for that if
> you think it
> will do any good.
>
> Only thing is, I hope it can take the form of a "Multiple Moderators can
> submit"  list option - and no passwords.
> It would be a list of people who were allowed to submit - sort of the
> opposite of the "kill" list.
>
> I don't know if it would be easier to program a "submitter list" than a
> password scheme, but the submitter list would be a lot easier for everyone
> to understand and use.
>
> It's gotta be easier to drop a guy off the list than to give
> everyone a new
> password - plus you can add a guest without giving them a password.
>
> (Ever try to get an entire Board of Directors online? - it aint a pretty
> sight.)
>

Well to be honest that was the original idea broached by Ipswitch to me.
After discussions, they thought my idea was a bit better, but I see no
reason why we couldn't ask for both. They haven't promised to actually do
these things, but they have made a commitment to look at them and see what
they could do.  I think their offer to devote some time to development on
these ideas is very generous and shows a maturity beyond other companies.
This type of friendly customer service is also why I am loath to leave
Ipswitch for other products!  I have experienced that through patience and a
willingness to work with them that often times you end up getting what
you'ves asked for.  What other company will do that?

The lead programmer I spoke with told me he could start working on some of
this in about two weeks, provided he isn't stopped by those evil marketing
fellows  ;0  so we'll see what happens.  I'll add your suggestion to my list
and send a revised list to him tonight along with any others we generate
here.

Anthony

Reply via email to